<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogisthenewblog.com/2007/02/27/ans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogisthenewblog.com/2007/02/27/ans/</link>
	<description>lucky for us, awful is the new awesome.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mofitta</title>
		<link>http://www.blogisthenewblog.com/2007/02/27/ans/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>mofitta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogisthenewblog.com/2007/02/27/ans/#comment-410</guid>
		<description>I loved the ultra fuzzy penguins!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the ultra fuzzy penguins!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.blogisthenewblog.com/2007/02/27/ans/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogisthenewblog.com/2007/02/27/ans/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>i think you're giving anna nicole smith far too much credit when you say that h.k.s kept her doped up so she wouldn't question him.  with or without drugs i don't think she was very smart.  also, she was with a number of different guys at once (as the babby daddy contest of 2007 proves) so obviously if h.k.s was trying to have control over her he was doing a pretty shit job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think you&#8217;re giving anna nicole smith far too much credit when you say that h.k.s kept her doped up so she wouldn&#8217;t question him.  with or without drugs i don&#8217;t think she was very smart.  also, she was with a number of different guys at once (as the babby daddy contest of 2007 proves) so obviously if h.k.s was trying to have control over her he was doing a pretty shit job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: youmybabydaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.blogisthenewblog.com/2007/02/27/ans/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>youmybabydaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogisthenewblog.com/2007/02/27/ans/#comment-400</guid>
		<description>Ah baby penguins.  So much better.  I thought your title was "Anus" at first glance ahaha.  I think Howard K. Stern is the evil that the media portrays him to be.  I don't think he really loved her and I think he was always motivated by the hopes of getting more cash from associating with her.  I think he didn't try to help her drug problem he enabled her because he didn't want her questioning him and choosing to be with others and she made an easier puppet if she was so doped up she was barely aware of her surroundings.  I think he wanted Daniel dead because he knew that the will did not give everything to Danni-Lynn but to Daniel.  He probably even drew up the will as her lawyer (not sure about that though-if the will was drawn up while he was still acting as her lawyer).  With Daniel out of the picture he knew that the inheiritance would be in question in court after Anna died and hey, he's a lawyer, how convenient for him to know just how these things work.  As Anna's new husband (kind of) he would have an excellent chance of being the one to get all the cash with the will in contest.  Him and Danni-Lynn (or however you spell it).  He definately wants to be the father too cause it makes it that much easier to make his case for the money, hence a potential cover up if he can make it happen if Larry Birkhead really is the father.  There is waaaay too much motivational circumstance pointing at him for me to think otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah baby penguins.  So much better.  I thought your title was &#8220;Anus&#8221; at first glance ahaha.  I think Howard K. Stern is the evil that the media portrays him to be.  I don&#8217;t think he really loved her and I think he was always motivated by the hopes of getting more cash from associating with her.  I think he didn&#8217;t try to help her drug problem he enabled her because he didn&#8217;t want her questioning him and choosing to be with others and she made an easier puppet if she was so doped up she was barely aware of her surroundings.  I think he wanted Daniel dead because he knew that the will did not give everything to Danni-Lynn but to Daniel.  He probably even drew up the will as her lawyer (not sure about that though-if the will was drawn up while he was still acting as her lawyer).  With Daniel out of the picture he knew that the inheiritance would be in question in court after Anna died and hey, he&#8217;s a lawyer, how convenient for him to know just how these things work.  As Anna&#8217;s new husband (kind of) he would have an excellent chance of being the one to get all the cash with the will in contest.  Him and Danni-Lynn (or however you spell it).  He definately wants to be the father too cause it makes it that much easier to make his case for the money, hence a potential cover up if he can make it happen if Larry Birkhead really is the father.  There is waaaay too much motivational circumstance pointing at him for me to think otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
